Friday , August 18 2017


breaking news 9

It seems as if every day we’re hearing about yet more ways that Crooked Hillary “Killary” Clinton is rigging the upcoming election, just like she rigged the Democratic primaries. You have got to check this out, courtesy of!

Yet another report has emerged in the aftermath of the DNC convention alleging that staffers used sophisticated technologies to blackout negative coverage and literally drown out dissident voices.

Hillary’s 2016 coronation just wouldn’t be the same without the Orwellian overtones.

First there were reports that the convention had installed white noise generators over the sections that were pro-Bernie states. The white noise significantly drowns out the voices of anyone shouting in the radius.

Plenty of people find it hard to believe that such a device would be used against protesters in order to carefully control the DNC convention and make sure that it friendly for Hillary. However, a reporter on the campaign trail pointed out the use of these machines months before convention ever began.

Listen to the difference of before and after (around 9:20) the Clinton event when the white noise generator was switched on to cover-up the speech and make it incoherent.

Check out the video at around 8:36

But that’s not all.

Now reporters are coming forward to explain how their cellular and wifi devices were blacked out from transmitting images, posts, texts and communications when they encountered the perimeter of the convention at the Wells Fargo Center.

After several journalists, protesters and activists talked to each other about the signal jamming, the problem became apparent, as Mint Press reports:

Technology developed to jam cellphones during the Iraq War may be getting deployed against journalists reporting on protests against the political establishment in the United States.

While police and government surveillance of protests, including monitoring of cellphone use, is well-documented, efforts to block signals at protests remains an oft-repeated, but never proven, rumor.

It may be impossible to definitively prove that authorities are using cellphone “jamming” technology, but journalists working with both mainstream and independent media reported unusual difficulties accessing the internet during recent protests at the gates of the Democratic National Convention, consistent with the effects this very real technology could have.

During the protests outside the DNC, which I covered for MintPress News, I experienced this personally, with my internet connection behaving suspiciously near the convention’s security fences and entrance gates, often abruptly blocking my tweets and other communication. The same was true for every other journalist I spoke with who covered the protests.

“It’s scary for me as a journalist because that’s how state suppression of events occurs,” said Desiree Kane, a freelance journalist and direct action organizer who covered the Republican National Convention for MintPress and also took part in protests in Philadelphia.

“That’s exactly how it happens is you block communications of what might be going down,” she added.

Chilling for free speech, this problem with services was something that even the mainstream media had difficulties dealing with, and intensified during certain heightened activities, like President Obama’s speech or during the use of riot cops to quell protests:

Kane found that her cellphone service disappeared just as she filmed a group of armored riot police briefly deployed to the disruption outside of the DNC.

[…] “I walked away maybe five blocks back to my car,” where she found her service returned, allowing her to upload her video.

“Even mainstream journalists were starting to question whether we had some kind of jamming,” Ziegler told me.

Here’s an example of a cell phone jammer in action:

This stuff is military technology, as Mint Press makes clear, that has been used in theaters of war such as Iraq and Afghanistan, and is now being deployed on the streets of America – even to prop up an illegitimate leader.

It is worth noting that while greater attention has been paid to law enforcement’s use of large-scale military equipment like armored vehicles, cellphone jamming is another example of wartime technology brought home for domestic use. During the Iraq War,cellphone jammers known as Warlocks, were a highly secretive device designed to block the detonation of remote-control bombs.


The use of cellphone jamming technology to protect the president, as may have occurred on July 27 during the convention, is an open secret: occasionally reported on, but rarely discussed. The Washington Post reported in 2009:

“As President Obama’s motorcade rolled down Pennsylvania Avenue on Inauguration Day, federal authorities deployed a closely held law enforcement tool: equipment that can jam cellphones and other wireless devices to foil remote-controlled bombs, sources said.

It is an increasingly common technology, with federal agencies expanding its use as state and local agencies are pushing for permission to do the same. … But jamming remains strictly illegal for state and local agencies. Federal officials barely acknowledge that they use it inside the United States, and the few federal agencies that can jam signals usually must seek a legal waiver first.”

If elections are supposed to be about the voice of the people, and its participation in choosing our leaders, then technology has brought us to a sad day.

Ironically, when she was Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton condemned Iran for jammingTwitter and social media, and thereby blocking an Arab Spring-style revolution, which Hillary helped to foment in several other Middle Eastern and African nations.

Is jamming cell phone signals a viable, constitutionally-protected option for police, or do such actions by police and governments fall within the same  realm as Iran’s response to quelling organized protests by shutting off access to Facebook and Twitter? We note that at the time the Iranian government shut down the ability for protesters to organize they were met with strong opposition by none other than our own Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who said:


“The United States believes passionately and strongly in the basic principle of free expression.”

“We promote the right of free expression.”

“And it is the case that one of the means of expression, the use of Twitter is a very important one, not only to the Iranian people but now increasingly to people around the world, and most particularly to young people.”

“And I think keeping that line of communications open and enabling people to share information, particularly at a time when there was not many other sources of information, is an important expression of the right to speak out and to be able to organize.” -Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Yet, Hillary may have used this same anti-democratic tactic of silencing free speech “on her own people” during the DNC where she didn’t want anymore bad press.

The hand-picked nominee has come complete with the package deal of a bought and sold media, who will sing her praises and bury coverage of her opponents. They will also handle optics at events, use staged actors, hire seat fillers, coordinate teams to shout things like “USA! USA!” or “Hillary” over crowds that boo, say things like “Bernie” or “No More War” and anyone who would dare to question the presumptive next ruler of the United States.

We are in for dark times, and these high tech tools of control are just the beginning. What other tricks do they have up their sleeves?

Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats.

Follow us for more on our Cool To Be Conservative Facebook page by clicking on this blue sentence. 

Check Also

A Hospice Employee Steps Towards This Dying Lady. What The Camera Caught? WOW!

This is one of the most touching stories you will ever hear. Basically, what’s going …

  • Dawn Marchesani

    Who cares? Did he steal the birds? There are issues of more importance to worry ourselves with. This economy makes you get creative in finding ways to make money.

  • Bill Poteat

    Let them move to Minnesota the Governor wants whites gone too

  • They have many mini states within the states. They are called ghettos.

    • Arthur Jackson

      Yes, and they’re supported by the tax dollars of the white people they despise so much.

  • American Mutt


    • Danny Rench

      We people of Illinois will donate Chicago if they make it separate from us and build a wall!

  • A. Christensen

    I have no idea if this story is true. It made me smile though. Common sense tells you 15% of the nations population cannot gain complete power over any state. Also what does the close relationship the US had with the Muslim brotherhood dating back to the 1950s and throughout the 70s have to do with the black panthers? After the 70s Our relationship with the muslim brotherhood was on again off again. Still….. Oh are we trying to trick people in to believing The nations 1% Muslim population is trying to take control of these states? Rather then accepting the obvious situation. The united states has been invading the middle east and overthrowing governments for control of oil dating back to the 40s. The united states has actively participated in the murders of millions of civillians in the middle east to gain government take over. Also killing Americans by sending them over to kill for oil.

  • Dawn Marchesani

    They already have a state, the state of fucking confusion!

  • Ormar

    They can not run a safe hood that is productive and vibrant how will they run a state in a state. It will be a Welfare black hole, just look at Africa’s black states/countries.

    • Ralph Sinamon

      Uh…if they set up there own country, that means they will be OFF the welfare train.

    • skulldruggery

      they take care of your mothers holes just fine.

      • Ormar

        Now you are raping dead women? You are a true African.

        • skulldruggery

          she isnt dead, they told you that because the abortion didnt work and she despised you.

  • Ralph Sinamon

    So…..this particular group of racists are trying comedy to get there way? Uh….wow, just wow! This is gonna get their shoot-em up going. Anybody ever pay attention to how they handle their guns. The fools are suicidal!

  • Jack Thomas

    Can one imagine what their ‘country’ would look like? Take a shot (Oops) at what the cities where they live look like in their ‘hoods’. Need I say more?

    • alli

      Imagine Chicago across 5 states.


    I hear there’s lots of room in Liberia.

  • Dennis Crawford

    ship them back to the jungle then see how they feel about the usa

  • Jac

    Never going to happen……First time it’s open season you all will be gone.

  • Kevin Todd Mehaffy

    Hmmmm ,well that means no more funding of any programs what so ever from the US government…That might work !!! I think Someone isn`t thinking when they made that statement..That could save American tax payers Billions of $$$$..Go ahead please do !!!!

  • william

    They can move to Liberia. They need help. Bring those idiots with you who said when Trump gets elected they will leave the US.

  • Ormar

    They were given a country years ago, Liberia. So go home!

  • Bill Cano

    I would give them all the states around Chcongo . Move out every Black American and there Nigga loving groupies to those states . Then build a large wall around them with armed guards . Let them take care for there own people in side the states and yes I would support funding of helping Blacks to go to there new Home land !

  • Gina Lawter

    no…go back to your Mother country. With the lions, disease, starvation….or…shut up and sit down!

  • Ronald Grossman

    They have Baltimore. BUT I agree. I see no problem with setting aside a State or District and ceeding it to African Americans. Just do not ask for aid when the welfare runs out.